Readify

Norwegian Campaign of 1940

The Parallax View

The Norwegian Campaign of 1940 is presented through a striking conjunction of invasion and image-making. When the German Army invaded Norway in spring 1940, Martin Heidegger treated the filming of airborne operations not as incidental documentation but as a metaphysical procedure: the circulation of images, he argued, belonged to the activity of war itself.

Military Mobilization and Heidegger’s Response

The campaign serves as a concrete instance in a broader discussion of Martin Heidegger’s changing responses to German militarization and the war effort. The book distinguishes direct endorsement of an aggressive military stance from a sympathetic neutrality that regarded total mobilization as an expression of modern nihilism while remaining fascinated by technological efficiency. Heidegger’s remarks on the invasion’s filmed operations belong to this latter tension: military technology is not simply condemned as materialism but understood as participating in a larger transformation.

Filming as Part of the Operation

Heidegger focuses on an aircraft that films paratroops during an airborne operation. He rejects the interpretation of this recording as sensational curiosity. Once the footage is circulated after several days, he argues, the resulting consciousness and vision of the activity become elements of the global operation and factors in armament. The camera therefore does more than preserve an image of an event already completed: its recording and later circulation are treated as integrated into the event’s military reach.

The Metaphysical Meaning of Reporting

By calling filmed reporting a metaphysical procedure, Heidegger places it outside the standards of everyday representation. The example complicates any simple opposition between military violence and its media image: in his account, the image is not merely a detached report on the campaign but part of the mobilization it depicts. The book uses this argument to show how Heidegger could recognize technological mediation as a feature of modernity while assigning it a significance beyond ordinary journalistic documentation.